What's more eco-friendly: Steel furnaces or Electric furnaces?

What's more eco-friendly: Steel furnaces or Electric furnaces? - Aerial view of factory with shabby buildings and rusty industrial constructions located in harbor of city

Steel furnaces cause far more pollution than electric furnaces.

However, electric furnaces use up energy, and when I burn coal (or solid fuel) in boilers to power these, I am also causing pollution.

Assuming I am not using solar panels but only boilers and steam engines to power my ore industry, which one is the greener option per unit of ore smelted?



Best Answer

Steel furnaces cause pollution but electric furnaces do not.

Firstly, this is not quite true. Electric furnaces do produce pollution, but only about a quarter of the amount steel furnaces do (0.9 pollution to 3.6, according to their linked wiki pages).

Electric furnaces use up 180kW of electrical energy. Steel furnaces use 180 kW of fuel energy. However, boilers have an efficiency of only 50%. They generate 390kW of heat energy for every 780 kW of fuel the burn, and in the process produce 6 pollution. Steam engines then convert the heat energy to electrical energy - I believe this is at 100% efficiency, but I'm not sure.

So the output from one boiler can power two electrical furnaces with 30kW to spare, and combined they produce (6 + 0.9 + 0.9) = 7.8 pollution. Two steel furnaces produce only 7.2 pollution, with nothing to spare.

Scale that up so you can use the excess power output from the boiler, and you have:

  • 6 boilers at 6 pollution each - 36 pollution
  • 13 electric furnaces at 0.9 pollution each - 11.7 pollution
  • Which makes 47.7 pollution in total

This compares with 13 steel furnaces at 3.6 pollution each, which makes 46.8 pollution in total.

Therefore: steel furnaces are greener than boiler-powered electrical furnaces.

Of course two other factors can come into play:

  • Solar power, which produces no pollution and uses no fuel (set up costs aside)
  • Modules. Electric furnaces can store two modules. These can be used to reduce the electricity consumed by the furnace to 20% (I think) of their standard usage. In this case 6 boilers could power 65 electric furnaces, producing 36 + (65 * 0.9)=94.5 pollution. Meanwhile 65 steel furnaces would produce 65 * 3.6 = 234 pollution - nearly two and a half times more.

Edit: As @MSalters points out, efficiency modules also reduce the pollution from the furnaces themselves, so polution is actually reduced to 36 + (65 * 0.9 * 0.2) = 47.7 pollution. That means steel furnaces pollute nearly five times more than this.




Pictures about "What's more eco-friendly: Steel furnaces or Electric furnaces?"

What's more eco-friendly: Steel furnaces or Electric furnaces? - Gray Hand Tool
What's more eco-friendly: Steel furnaces or Electric furnaces? - Low Angle View of Posts Under Blue Calm Sky
What's more eco-friendly: Steel furnaces or Electric furnaces? - Contemporary open plan kitchen with gray matte cabinets and dining table under contemporary geometric lamp in spacous apartment



Is electric furnace better than steel furnace factorio?

Re: Electric Furnaces vs Steel Furnaces Electric and Chemical furnaces both consume an equal amount of energy (180 KW), but as Fright stated, converting chemical to electrical fuel incurs a 50% efficiency penalty. So without modules, the Steel Furnace is more fuel efficient then the Electrical one.

Are electric furnaces worth it Factorio?

In the long run it's pretty much a no-brainer to transition to electric furnaces, whether to reduce pollution, take advantage of productivity or simplify setups (eliminating fuel belt).

How can I make my electric furnace more efficient?

These seven simple tips will ensure your furnace isn't using too much energy \u2014 which will save you cash.
  • Change the air filter. ...
  • Check and clean the vents. ...
  • Clean out the furnace. ...
  • Rethink the thermostat. ...
  • Put a sweater on. ...
  • Get a tune-up. ...
  • Upgrade your equipment.




  • Rnbstylerz \u0026 AREES - WHAT




    More answers regarding what's more eco-friendly: Steel furnaces or Electric furnaces?

    Answer 2

    A steel furnace produces 3.6 pollution.

    An electric furnace produces 0.9 pollution, but also requires 180kW of electricity to work at full speed. Solar panels produce clean electricity but boilers and steam engines do not.

    For the purposes of calculations, we will use the most efficient 1:14:10 pump:boiler:engine ratio.

    A steam engine produces 510 kW of electricity from 1.4 boilers. The engine provides enough for 2.83 furnaces. If 2.83 furnaces require 1.4 boilers, we can assume there will be twice as many furnaces as boilers.

    A boiler produces 6 pollution- 3 per furnace. This means that factoring in steam power generation, the electric furnace produces 3.9 pollution.

    Note that this doesn't take into account mines or loaders involved.

    Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

    Images: Pok Rie, Nikolaos Dimou, Brett Sayles, Max Vakhtbovych