Is 'snecko eye' a bad choice without 2-cost cards?

Is 'snecko eye' a bad choice without 2-cost cards? - Distressed woman sitting on lakeside and touching face in despair

A lot of players seem to believe that in order to make Snecko eye a good choice of boss relic, the deck should contain high-cost cards. They are hesitant to pick this relic up. The thought is that snecko eye changes the costs of cards to 1.5, and that therefore, compared to an energy relic, the snecko eye makes a tradeoff:

  1. You get more cards to choose from;
  2. Cards cost 1.5, so you can play less cards than without it when your cards are mostly cheap. So 2 cards per turn seems to be what you can do on average.

In addition, everything can cost 2 or 3 sometimes, allowing you to play only one card. Therefore, Snecko should rarely be picked, especially without 2-cost cards.

Is this assumption correct?






Pictures about "Is 'snecko eye' a bad choice without 2-cost cards?"

Is 'snecko eye' a bad choice without 2-cost cards? - Anonymous man using smartphone while placing order with credit card sitting near cosmetic products
Is 'snecko eye' a bad choice without 2-cost cards? - Stressed woman sitting with eyes closed on lake shore
Is 'snecko eye' a bad choice without 2-cost cards? - Positive young female in casual clothes smiling while covering eyes with delicious doughnuts





This is tragic: GOP senator




Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

Images: RODNAE Productions, Cup of Couple, RODNAE Productions, Andres Ayrton